Wrote the book entitled “Science Speaks, Scientific Proof of the Accuracy of Prophecy and the Bible.“
Darwin’s Fairy Tales
The Lost Tribe of the Tasaday’s
I was stationed in the Northern Island of the Philippines, (Luzon) in 1972 at Clark AFB. and I remember hearing about the Tasaday tribe quite well. The previous year a discovery was made that fired up the world of anthropology like nothing else ever had. The discovery of a cave-dwelling tribe called the Tasaday Tribe. They were discovered living naked in caves using stone age tools. It was such a huge discovery that National Geographic ran special articles on the tribe’s people. A cadre of scientists along with the rich and famous traveled to the Philippines just to see these primitives. Journalists and their publishers couldn’t get enough of this stuff. Books were written, television specials were run all filled with explanations on how this tribe lived, what they ate and on and on.
Check it out for yourself: Here is the actual article from Time Magazine archives dated Oct. 1971.
But like so many fairy tales, they sometimes end badly. And this one only had one problem–it was all an act, set up to raise money.
The scientific world had rushed in and took the bait–hook, line and sinker! Like they did with Eoanthropus dawsoni, aka: Piltdown Man.
Supposedly it all unraveled when a missionary had recognized some of the tribes people from one of those magazine articles he’d read. It was a group he’d worked with and knew they weren’t living in caves, nor were naked…(those nasty christians, always interfering with science!).As it turned out a minor Philippine official by the name of Manuel Elizalde Jr., paid local farmers to live in the caves, take off their clothes, and appear Stone Age. They even rehearsed using stone impliments. Unfortunately Manuel Elizalde Jr. absconded with a large bankroll of money taken from funds set aside to provide lands for the Tasaday’s themselves.Here’s one of the remaining articles I’ve found about what really happened. You can research it for yourself and read numerous articles about this fraud…but sometimes the truth is hard to swallow, (especially when you have a group that gets funding for perpetuating the lie).
Not to be confused with the facts of the case, some “scientists” still cling to the theory that the Tasaday are a stone age people co-opted by the modern world.
My wife and I frequently go to Hawaii and visit our son and daughter in law who live there. We’ve met these Polynesian Americans– who run a cultural center at Kualoa Ranch’s Macadamia Nut Farm. When attired in native costume, it’s not difficult to imagine them paddling in dugouts between islands. I would like to see what Darwin would have written about them had the HMS Beagle put into port there. Chief Sieulu and staff there at Kualoa are fluent in a number of languages, intelligent, well traveled, funny and know how to entertain, plus I think he drives a beamer. The Chief’s survival skills are unsurpassed! He can shell a coconut in seconds, make fire in a minute and play the drums. (If you go to O’ahu Hawaii I recommend you go to the Kualoa Macadamia Nut Farm and take the tour!) Darwin’s writings were applied to reinforce their long history of racist ideas, now cloaked in the name of science. To classify some men as more evolved and superior than others, unfortunately led to the deaths of many who were considered less than human such as the Australian Aboriginal people. See Evolution and Racism.
Fulfillment Of Over 300 Prophecies by One Man
315 Miraculous Old Testament Prophecies Jesus Fulfilled
Evolution and Racism
Organized hunts to find and kill Aboriginal people for the furtherance of science began a grizzly business of murder and mayhem as aboriginal burial sites were desecrated, bodies dismembered and skeletons exhumed. This followed on the heels of the publication of Origin of Species, The Preservation of Favoured Races by Charles Darwin. It was theorized by many at the time that Aboriginal people were a living example of a sub-human specie. The hint of racial superiority in the sub-title of Darwin’s book was not overlooked in Nazi Germany even if it is (completely omitted) on the infidel website.
After an outcry from Aboriginal peoples, the Natural History Museum in London November 17th (2006) issued a statememt in response to a claim lodged by the Australian Government in November 2005 and to a request under that claim from the Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre (TAC) to return the remains of 17 aboriginals.
As many have said before, racism existed long before Charles Darwin arrived on the scene. However, having said that, Charles Darwin’s theory bestowed a scientific sanction, and provided a reason for racists to acheive their ends.
Darwinian Racism: Darwin’s subtitle for his “Origin of Species” is “The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life,” exposing his own personal bias. Later in “The Descent of Man” Darwin suggested that in time “the savage races” would be eliminated through a process of “natural selection.” Hitler reaffirmed this belief in Mein Kampf. In his view Arians were the most highly evolved humans and Jews were the least evolved and most ape like. This same racist thinking is seen in the works of other prominent atheists such as Thomas Huxley, Herbert Spencer, Sigmund Freud and Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood’s founder.
Sanger actually provided a working model for Nazi Germany’s eugenics programs.
By contrast The Declaration of Independence states: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…” Atheism cannot pass down such an endowment. Can you name an example of a nation that has a free society that is based on the premise of atheism?
A belief in God is essential to the belief in the equality of man. Even that is no guarantee of civil freedom unless it is based on the Judeo – Christian teachings of the Bible. People are leaving non-Christian countries and migrating to Christian countries and not the other way around. They “vote with their feet.”
Little by little atheists are getting favorable rulings from judges who are virtually legislating from the bench. The myth of the “wall of separation of church and state” has become a reality by a skewed interpretation which deviates entirely from the intent of the founding fathers and doesn’t even exist in the US Constitution. Now the government is becoming more involved in religion by actually restricting the “free exercise thereof.”
The point is if the Creator provides our rights as the Declaration of Independence states, then the government cannot take those rights away they are inalienable rights. If however the Government is the provider of those rights, then the government can also take them away.
When judges can without legislation amend the US Constitution as they have with the infamous and non existent “Separation Clause” then we are already heading down the slippery slope that will spell the doom of our freedoms, and America will have been a golden dream lost to history.
Welcoming the Fundi Driveby Blog
What About the Virgin Birth? Is It Necessary?
He would be born of the “Seed of the woman.”
This is a direct three part prophecy referring to three distinct events in the life of Jesus Christ:
1. The virgin birth of Jesus Christ (seed of the woman).
2. His victory over the serpent, (Satan)
3. His own suffering (bruised heel).
Note that in the Bible it’s always the case that offspring are the ‘seed of their father’ and not the reverse; except here!
Old Testament prophecy of Isaiah:
The New Testament fulfillment:
‘Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and bear a Son, and they shall call His name Immanuel,’ which is translated, “God with us.” – Matthew 1:23
Mary, the mother of Jesus herself wondered about what was to take place in her life.
“Then the angel said to her, Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bring forth a Son, and shall call His name JESUS. He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Highest; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David. And He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of His kingdom there will be no end.” Then Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I do not know a man?” And the angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Highest will overshadow you; therefore, also, that Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God. – Like 1:30-35
Joseph, her betrothed learned of her pregnancy and this is what the Bible says about that:
“Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: After His mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Spirit. Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not wanting to make her a public example, was minded to put her away secretly. But while he thought about these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins.” – Matthew 1:18-21.
This is the record – “and (Joseph) did not know (have intercourse with) her till she had brought forth her firstborn Son. And he called His name JESUS.” – Matthew 1:25 (Jesus means “Savior”)
Jesus was this promised ‘seed’ of the woman that God said would deal the death blow to Satan and crush the ‘serpents head.’ Satan was embodied in the serpent of the Garden of Eden. Jesus crushed him on the cross but eventually will cast him into the lake of fire.
The promised seed (Jesus) would also suffer a non-lethal blow. The crucifixion of Jesus was referred to here. Though He died physically, he remained alive in the spiritual realm for he himself dismissed his spirit on the cross after assuring the penitent thief that they would be together in Paradise that very day.
Question: Don’t Pagan Traditions Also Have A Promised Seed And A Virgin Birth Story?
The birth of Jesus is not the first story that contains a chosen seed or a virgin birth. Does the word counterfeit ring a bell? Don’t forget that Satan (Lucifer) was in the Garden of Eden with the first human couple. After persuading them to disobey God, Satan heard with his own ears God’s pronouncement of his own doom at the heel of the virgin born, promised seed of the woman. Remember, Satan (the devil, Lucifer) wants to be God and will counterfeit the things of God to suit his evil purpose. It doesn’t surprise me that he uses his powers of deception to present a false messiah. Satan has done it in the past and will again do it in the future (i. e. false Christs).
Is It Necessary To Believe In The Virgin Birth?
Question: What if you believe in Christ and accept most of the Bible but chalk up miracles like the virgin birth to ‘allegory?’
Answer: If Jesus wasn’t the fruit of a virgin’s womb he couldn’t save himself, much less mankind. How can I make a such a dogmatic statement as that? Because when Adam sinned, he contaminated the gene pool of his descendants. The life of the flesh is in the blood, and death passed on to all men because all have sinned. The only remedy for sin is the shedding of innocent blood. The problem is that all of the descendants of Adam have a sinful nature and can not pay the price for redemption. The solution for centuries was an annual sacrifice of a spotless lamb, a temporary, substitutional atonement for the sins of the people. When a family would remember the Passover, for instance, the head of the family would provide a lamb; but God had His own Lamb.
The science behind it is that the blood of an individual is determined by their father – not their mother. So when Jesus came, born of a virgin, offspring of the Holy Spirit (God), His blood was the only uncontaminated human blood in the universe (since Adam before he sinned). In effect, Jesus was the second Adam. Since He never sinned, He was able to offer his own blood once and for all for the sins of the world, eliminating the need for an annual sacrifice.
We know His sacrifice was accepted from symbols like the rending of the veil in the Temple that opened up the Holy of Holies to the common people.
So what would be the ramifications if Jesus was born of a human father? The answer is quite simply that He could never save anyone from their sins being lost himself. So the ultimate answer to the question, “is belief in the virgin birth necessary?” it’s a resounding yes! But belief may take time. It’s a building process. I knew I’d met Jesus on the night of August 8, 1964 but by August 10th I was still filled with doubt about the importance of the virgin birth. It took prayerful study and then I finally saw what I’m sharing here. Jesus inherited his humanity from his mother but the blood, the cure for all sin was the unstained blood provided by God Himself.
It is only through that blood, and nothing but that blood we have cleansing from sin!
“If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth: But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.” – 1 John 1:6-7
From the Fundi Driveby Blog Archive
-
- Does America Appear In Bible Prophecy II
- Does America Appear In Bible Prophecy?
- Evolutionist-Creationist Debate
- What Last Days Society Will Look Like
- A Bible Sign of the Last Days
- Darwin Speaks! Quote of the Week
- Finding Fossils That Speak To Us
- Archaeopteryx or giving Creationists the Bird!
- Quote of the Week
America’s Christian Foundation
We’ve all heard some idiot say that America’s founders never thought or intended for America to be a religious or Christian nation. That’s why I wanted to reprint, here in this blog,
1st Session
H. RES. 888
Affirming the rich spiritual and religious history of our Nation’s founding and subsequent history and expressing support for designation of the first week in May as `American Religious History Week’ for the appreciation of and education on America’s history of religious faith.
December 18, 2007
Mr. FORBES (for himself, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. AKIN, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. GINGREY, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. HAYES, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. HERGER, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. MCHENRY, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. PENCE, Mr. PITTS, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. WOLF, and Mr. YOUNG of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Affirming the rich spiritual and religious history of our Nation’s founding and subsequent history and expressing support for designation of the first week in May as `American Religious History Week’ for the appreciation of and education on America’s history of religious faith.
(1) the use of the Bible to administer the oath;
(2) affirming the religious nature of the oath by the adding the prayer `So help me God!’ to the oath;
(3) inaugural prayers offered by the President;
(4) religious content in the inaugural address;
(5) civil leaders calling the people to prayer or acknowledgement of God;
(6) inaugural worship services attended en masse by Congress as an official part of congressional activities; and
(7) clergy-led inaugural prayers, activities which have been replicated in whole or part by every subsequent President;
Whereas the first week in May each year would be an appropriate week to designate as `American Religious History Week’:
(2) recognizes that the religious foundations of faith on which America was built are critical underpinnings of our Nation’s most valuable institutions and form the inseparable foundation for America’s representative processes, legal systems, and societal structures;
(3) rejects, in the strongest possible terms, any effort to remove, obscure, or purposely omit such history from our Nation’s public buildings and educational resources; and
(4) expresses support for designation of a `American Religious History Week’ every year for the appreciation of and education on America’s history of religious faith.
Bush Lied?
Bush lied?
The oft repeated mantra of the left—“Bush Lied, men died” is a criticism that is based deeply in the hypocrisy of the left. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence cleared the Bush Administration of purposely and knowingly manipulating intelligence reports on Iraq’s WMD (weapons of mass destruction) program. They did make the point however that the Bush administration proceeded to war on the basis of faulty intelligence but look at what some Democrats said prior to the war:
If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program. President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.
“Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.” Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.
“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.” Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998.
“[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.” Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.
“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.” Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.
“Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.” Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.
“There is no doubt that … Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.” Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.
“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.” Sen. Carl Levin (D. MI), Sept. 19, 2002.
“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.” Nobel Peace Prize Winner, Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.” Academy Award winner, Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
-
Archives
- September 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (4)
- January 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (1)
- November 2008 (2)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (1)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


